Typical reasons given are the introduction of the smoking ban, people’s concern for his or her health and consumers wanting to save money.
A pack of 20 can cost anywhere between £4 and £8 a box, while the packs for e-cigarettes retail for around £20 a kit which means around 100 cigarettes.
The introduction of the smoking ban in the UNITED KINGDOM in 2007 is also a factor – the moment smoking lounges went out of airports and offices, cafes and restaurants became electric, die-hard smokers began looking for solutions.
smoking package
Remember these smoking containers in airports?
“E-cigarettes are getting to be a confident lifestyle choice. Teenagers particularly are earnestly choosing to ‘vape’ rather than smoke,” he explained.
Is it healthier?
It’s fair to mention the reason why a substantial number of smokers try e-cigarettes can be as ways to reduce or quit smoking altogether.
Nevertheless, as a business, the doesn’t determine the products as health/medicinal, nor are they controlled as tobacco products.
They fall into the general sales items Excise & Customs classification, and fall under Trading Standards procedures for legislation.
Press headlines throughout the world haven't been kind towards the business in recent weeks – a number of papers published reports about a review by professor Christina Gratziou, who claimed her research found a sudden rise in airway resistance in our group of members who used e-cigarettes.
The evidence is roundly rubbished by the community, which said there was no concrete evidence to support her assumptions.
the evidence for real damage being caused was lacking
that e-cigarettes can't cause lower oxygen levels in the blood, as were noted
that e-cigarettes aren't designed to become a stopping support, but a consumer choice
This short article doesn’t purpose to fall on one side of the argument or another – nevertheless the fact the argument remains continuing shows one of the challenges the continues to manage from a company perspective.
And it's interesting to note that legally, e-cigarettes still cannot claim to be harmless.
Sue Bowyer, senior associate at law firm Lewis Silkin, told us: “Advertisers cannot indicate the e-cigarettes and their nicotine dose aren’t harmful, otherwise this can be prone to fall foul of great BRITAIN Code of Non-broadcast Advertising, Sales Promotion and Direct Marketing.”
marlboro person
May the market come up with an ad as convincing because the Marlboro Man?
Companies must be careful in future also, said Bowyer. “It can be suggested e-cigarettes are being sold in a glamourised method which might attract a fresh market (not merely existing smokers) and potentially teenagers/children.
The long run
Freshcig’s Wilson cautions any government interference to re-classify the productas a tobacco one, and therefore use tobacco work, could kill-off its reputation and remove any money saving benefits.
“And if they are classified as a medical product, they'll be at the mercy of different legislation which could also force the cost up, resulting in fewer people changing from tobacco products,” he continued.
A spokesman for another model, Skycig, also told us people were wary of something that's not authorized by the government or the NHS.
“However, my interest the government is always to not manage to the point where this wonderful concept is gagged like the tobacco industry,” the spokesman continued.
But certainly the savings made to the NHS managing smoking-related diseases would have been a bonus?”
One answer could be for the marketplace to manage itself.
““There are signs the e-cigarette industry is taking steps to try and self-regulate,” explained Lewis Silkin’s Bowyer.
“For example… publishers are including disclaimers which make it clear these products are for over 18s, contain nicotine which may be harmful and is addictive, and that the item is supposed only for existing smokers.”
If e-cigarettes may shake off the sick reputations they’ve found in certain areas, and if the government continues using its hands-off approach, they may be a key industry for the future.
A pack of 20 can cost anywhere between £4 and £8 a box, while the packs for e-cigarettes retail for around £20 a kit which means around 100 cigarettes.
The introduction of the smoking ban in the UNITED KINGDOM in 2007 is also a factor – the moment smoking lounges went out of airports and offices, cafes and restaurants became electric, die-hard smokers began looking for solutions.
smoking package
Remember these smoking containers in airports?
“E-cigarettes are getting to be a confident lifestyle choice. Teenagers particularly are earnestly choosing to ‘vape’ rather than smoke,” he explained.
Is it healthier?
It’s fair to mention the reason why a substantial number of smokers try e-cigarettes can be as ways to reduce or quit smoking altogether.
Nevertheless, as a business, the doesn’t determine the products as health/medicinal, nor are they controlled as tobacco products.
They fall into the general sales items Excise & Customs classification, and fall under Trading Standards procedures for legislation.
Press headlines throughout the world haven't been kind towards the business in recent weeks – a number of papers published reports about a review by professor Christina Gratziou, who claimed her research found a sudden rise in airway resistance in our group of members who used e-cigarettes.
The evidence is roundly rubbished by the community, which said there was no concrete evidence to support her assumptions.
the evidence for real damage being caused was lacking
that e-cigarettes can't cause lower oxygen levels in the blood, as were noted
that e-cigarettes aren't designed to become a stopping support, but a consumer choice
This short article doesn’t purpose to fall on one side of the argument or another – nevertheless the fact the argument remains continuing shows one of the challenges the continues to manage from a company perspective.
And it's interesting to note that legally, e-cigarettes still cannot claim to be harmless.
Sue Bowyer, senior associate at law firm Lewis Silkin, told us: “Advertisers cannot indicate the e-cigarettes and their nicotine dose aren’t harmful, otherwise this can be prone to fall foul of great BRITAIN Code of Non-broadcast Advertising, Sales Promotion and Direct Marketing.”
marlboro person
May the market come up with an ad as convincing because the Marlboro Man?
Companies must be careful in future also, said Bowyer. “It can be suggested e-cigarettes are being sold in a glamourised method which might attract a fresh market (not merely existing smokers) and potentially teenagers/children.
The long run
Freshcig’s Wilson cautions any government interference to re-classify the productas a tobacco one, and therefore use tobacco work, could kill-off its reputation and remove any money saving benefits.
“And if they are classified as a medical product, they'll be at the mercy of different legislation which could also force the cost up, resulting in fewer people changing from tobacco products,” he continued.
A spokesman for another model, Skycig, also told us people were wary of something that's not authorized by the government or the NHS.
“However, my interest the government is always to not manage to the point where this wonderful concept is gagged like the tobacco industry,” the spokesman continued.
But certainly the savings made to the NHS managing smoking-related diseases would have been a bonus?”
One answer could be for the marketplace to manage itself.
““There are signs the e-cigarette industry is taking steps to try and self-regulate,” explained Lewis Silkin’s Bowyer.
“For example… publishers are including disclaimers which make it clear these products are for over 18s, contain nicotine which may be harmful and is addictive, and that the item is supposed only for existing smokers.”
If e-cigarettes may shake off the sick reputations they’ve found in certain areas, and if the government continues using its hands-off approach, they may be a key industry for the future.